![]() ![]() I think people object on principle, rather than due to the actual cost - except for those who were previously using cracked copies and/or not paying for upgrades of course.Īs mentioned by another poster, Adobe's DNG converter is free - but if you stick to those principles you won't want to use it, will you? If you are willing to pay for software, Adobe's monthly subscription is cheaper than the old system of outright purchase followed by paid upgrades, so the objection makes no sense. (You could argue that this is no different from developing in Lightroom followed by editing in Photoshop, but Lightroom is much more capable than DPP so you can make that commitment at a later stage in the editing process.) You have 'developed' the RAW file so in that sense there is data loss, but it's very minor. TIFF is lossless in the sense that there are no compression artefacts. ![]() If you're not willing to pay for software, use DPP. tiff, will there be any degradation? If not, I could import the. If I import to Canon's software and export to. Other than Adobe, what are you guys using to edit your photos? I have been using PhotosScape X Pro for my CR2 work but it does not support CR3. Been an Adobe user for over a decade but no more.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |